Nihilism? Oh of course not
I hate the poor. Or rather that is so crude, the notion of poor, in the world of democracy or whatever system deems itself fit to deliver such promise. You see, as plainly simple as it is, human are stupid in the crowds, of which we choose to flow with the flow rather than resist the impending storm that would sweep of everything we simply care of. The poor notion amplifies that. It gives those impoverished of nourishment vulnerabilities, elude themselves of the humanity of which they can have. It strips of reasons, for the poor to talk good, to elude their own existences, their own personalities, their own flaws, the wicked thoughts, the dishonourable actions toward a singular reason of which is unfalsifiable, toward many cases when one wants to persecute such. They speak of the good, and of mercy, yet see the forgiver begging for forgiveness once they are in power. Just as the grass is greener on the other side, so is the ‘good’ betrayed itself on due date. Such is why democracy is fake. As to rise on top means not enough of those people with good qualities, of the scourge of wishes indicted upon the losers to make them forgo of the price they have to pay, to amplify the voice of the stupidness, such is to justify it of emotional reasons. What can be worse? When those being educated, of those people whose mouths was kept restrained, of those people truly know of what made of the world, however skewed their worldview are. I cannot help but to pity both sides, as to neither of them are right.
Wait, isn’t that nihilism? And why the hell in any given sense such is to say democracy is fake? It’s a coalition-building tool in systems where individual narratives can’t scale. It cannot be so useless, so is fake? Democracy isn’t “fake” because it produces truth. Democracy is valuable because it’s less bad than alternatives at preventing concentrated power from becoming tyrannical.
Democracy at its end of the merit is simply the structure in which we are all pawns to play in. There is no truth in this barren world, beautiful yet dry, holistic yet deeply dirty as it is. There is no truth, for which if there is one we might have already cling on it. But so is historical precedences told us that such notion change over time. What you see as truth, I don’t see it that way. For you to not live truly, for you to be clouded by social construct.
That means too, that your quantum mechanics papers are meaningless (physics presumes knowable regularities). Are you surrendering? Money is a social construct. It’s also real in its effects. So is society, depends on what you consider real.
There is no truth, yes, so is my quantum formalism, or of anything. I do not claim it to be, but rather to satisfy myself of the endless debate, of the endless “mystery”. No one can claim anything as truth, for truth is subjective in popularity, and for opinion the minor voice. The way I do modelling is to do that - to be as flexible of a foundational theory that will precede mathematics, yet allow for those voices to rise and for the stringent old to gradually vanish of its conservations. It is simply there as an explanation, and such changes. Such will be kicked out in due time when I will no longer be here. I think you are misunderstanding me, or things have been flying over your head. Fake does not mean it does not exist. Fake means it does not serve what it claims to be. So is democracy to be imperfect. So is that every system fails. Because at the end of the day the word ideology has its colloquial as to be ‘ideal’. Such ideal never sets on the land of reality. So is also communism of which claims even the superior version of such. Of where the world lives in utopia of Marx and Engel, but forgo of the fact that utopian is the same as dystopian.